Theft, yes. Yet there will be others sticking up for this atrocious behavior. Can you imagine what will happen when NYC goes Communist?
Zen Locust - 2013-10-14 13:17:13-0400 - Updated: 2013-10-14 13:17:46-0400
Very impressed with the word of mouth that got these people food they need to sustain their familes from a giant corporation that rips them off and destroys their community. Walmart can afford it. A little giving back on Canadian Thanksgiving. How nice of them. I won't be surprised when they have tallied the bill and present the bill to the state. Regarding new york going communist... What does that even mean?
Thinking about this case a little more, I am reminded of a lecture from my grade 8 Ethics class. Mr. Otteson raised the question as to whether it was morally wrong to steal a loaf of bread to feed a starving family. Much discussion ensued, but the lecture concluded with the answer: yes, it is morally wrong; but the baker may (should?) choose to forgive the thief.
The key was that just because the need is great, the baker has still been robbed.
+Katherine Tomsich-Evans you are a very strange person. There is nothing in google talking about NYC and communism except from the McCarthy era and we all know how nuts he was. So enjoy your opinion or fear induced coma. Unless I'm just being trolled. Hard to tell these days.
+Jeff Cave I understand the argument and I will always side with poor people over corporations. That's just how I am. I think both sides of the argument are fair questions and not antagonistic. It is my opinion human life need is always more important to property rights. It comes down to consumerism, which is a programmed state, or humanism which is a more natural state of being. I think most people would prefer to be nice and compassionate.
Regarding new york going communist... What does that even mean?
The key was that just because the need is great, the baker has still been robbed.
+Jeff Cave I understand the argument and I will always side with poor people over corporations. That's just how I am. I think both sides of the argument are fair questions and not antagonistic. It is my opinion human life need is always more important to property rights. It comes down to consumerism, which is a programmed state, or humanism which is a more natural state of being. I think most people would prefer to be nice and compassionate.